retirement, annuities, long term care, pensions on divorce
 
 
retirement, annuity, long term care, pensions on divorce  
search this site
  Best Annuity Rates
  annuity rate directory
  best annuity rates
  conventional rates
  smoker rates
  other annuity rates
  Annuities
  annuity rates explained
  annuity quotes
  pension annuity
  open market option
  with profit annuities
  smoker annuities
  diabetes annuity
  impaired health
  long term care
  immediate needs
  purchased life annuity
  Pensions
  pension simplification
  employer pensions
  private pensions
  state pensions
  other pension benefits
  pensions in retirement
  leaving service
  corporate benefits
  director SSAS
  salary sacrifice
  income drawdown
  drawdown rates
  Divorce
  marriage breakdown
  divorce proceedings
  ancillary relief
  step-by-step guide
  assets on divorce
  pension on divorce
  pension analysis
  CETV valuations
  pensions valuation
  £25 Actuarial Report
  £50 Uniformed Report
  pension sharing
  case study
  earmarking
  Topics
  legislation
  your questions
  terms and conditions
  privacy policy
free annuity quote will you also qualify for enhanced or impaired life rates?
annuity quote
up to 30% extra income from an open market option
Editor also
recommends
 
summary of key links for pensions on divorce
 
shares & unit trusts on uk divorce
 
divorce law influence on marriage breakdown
 
valuation options realise higher pension values on divorce
home | about us | our services | contact us | site map | links
 
glossary

 

open market option annuities could increase your income
  Best Annuity Rates to secure the highest income
for your money and compare the annuity rates that offer different features such as single, joint life or escalation.
 
  Increase your annuity income by up to 30%!
If you are retiring now, shop around for the highest open market annuity or we can do this for you, just use the free annuity quote
 
 
B - Buy
         
   
   
   

  Bookmark with:
What are these?  
Add Bookmark  


Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange (1990)
Mr. Barber was an employee of Guardian Royal Exchange (GRE) and a pension scheme member. The GRE pension was established as a contracted out non contributory scheme with a normal pensionable age of 62 for men and 57 for women. On redundancy an immediate pension income would be paid at age 55 for men and 50 for women.

Mr. Barber was made redundant at the age of 52 receiving cash benefits and statutory redundancy payments but was not entitled to the GRE retirement benefits due to his age in contrast to similarly aged women that would receive an immediate pension. Mr. Barber complained that this difference was sex discrimination and in breach of article 119 of the Treaty of Rome concerning equal pay for equal work.

The case was referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that subsequently held that the GRE could not lawfully refuse an immediate pension to Mr. Barber through the employers pension scheme. The ECJ decision was that pay for the purpose of article 119 of the Treaty of Rome does include an occupational pension scheme. It was held that the Barber judgment would apply only to pensionable service after 17 May 1990 and that equalisation rules for the retirement age of men and women must be equalised to the lower age for accrued members pension rights or any chosen age for future rights.

With the continued development of equal opportunities, the Treaty of Amsterdam broadened the definition of 'equal pay' in article 119 amended to 'equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or work for equal value' in article 141 and effective from 1 May 1999.


Benefits in kind
In addition to a basic salary, an employer will often make other payments to an employee such as overtime and bonuses. Also, the employer may provide benefits in kind such as a company car and payment of medical insurance premiums. Cash payments to an employee such as overtime will be reflected in the employers year end tax returns and the P60 issued to the employee.

The value for tax purposes of benefits in kind will be reflected on the form P11D benefits. All the remuneration described above can be used to frank pension contributions by the employee. Occupational pension schemes offer group additional voluntary contribution (AVC) facilities although, for employees earning less than £30,000, they may be better advised to direct their additional contributions to stakeholder pensions as there is the opportunity to commute part of the pension income to a tax free lump sum.


Best advice rule
Under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA), formally the Financial Services Act 1986 anyone selling or advising on investments and pensions must give clients and prospective clients best advice. This means the adviser will need to be aware of the client's circumstances and show where possible that the recommendations are based on an unbiased evaluation of what is best for the client.


BR 19 form
By submitting this to the Benefits Agency it is possible to obtain a statement of retirement benefit, up to 4 months prior to state retirement age. The statement will forecast expected basic pension plus state earnings related pension scheme (SERPS) based upon contributions made to date and likely future contributions.


BR 20 form
By submitting this to the Benefits Agency it is possible to obtain a lump sum valuation of state earnings related pension scheme (SERPS).


Brooks v Brooks (1995)
The couple married in 1977 and the case was first considered by the District Court in October 1992. The couple operated a successful family business where a small self administered scheme (SSAS) represented a significant part of the family assets. Mrs. Brooks was employed by the company and was eligible to receive significant benefits within the flexibility of the SSAS.

The court held that the SSAS was a post-nuptial settlement and therefore formed part of the matrimonial assets. The Judge awarded non-member pension benefits to Mrs. Brooks of £76,000 from the SSAS. On appeal the High Court, then the Appeal Court and finally the House of Lords all upheld the decision.


Bulk transfer
For an employers pension scheme a bulk transfer of the assets and liabilities other than on winding up could occur if; the employer closes a scheme such as a final salary pension to new entrants in favour of a money purchase scheme and offers an existing scheme member with accrued retirement benefits the option of a pension transfer or if part of the business is sold to a new employer the members pension rights will be protected by regulations although any future retirement benefits may not be maintained at previous levels.

Where a sale takes place the consent of the scheme member is required although an individual could instead choose a pension transfer to a personal pension, section 32 policies or no transfer at all. If the scheme is in surplus, on a bulk transfer the new scheme trustees will take responsibility for this amount. If the new scheme is underfunded, this surplus would help the scheme to meet the minimum funding requirement (MFR).

A bulk transfer could be achieved without the consent of members, however rarely occur due to the restrictions of the Preservation of Benefits Regulations 1991 and the restrictions imposed by the scheme rules.


Burrow v Burrow (1999)
The couple married in 1978, separated in 1994 and at the time of divorce they had two children. The total value of matrimonial assets exceeded £1,000,000 with the family home worth £400,000, the husband's interest in a company worth £275,000 and the husbands pension fund worth £265,000. The District Judge ordered the sale of the family home with £349,000 going to the wife with maintenance of £1,200 per month from the husband's income of £3,000 net per month.

There was also an earmarking order for half of the maximum possible tax free lump sum from the husband's pension and half of his annual pension income. The husband appealed against the earmarking order and this was allowed against the pension income only, as per the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 73) stating that an even split between the parties was not appropriate.


Buyout policy
An early leaver with a deferred pension can use a buyout policy to transfer from an occupational pension scheme. Under the Finance Act 1981, an employee can take out a deferred annuity policy through an insurance company.

This policy will be similar to a personal pension except that it will retain the occupational pension scheme regime with regard to the Inland Revenue maximums for the benefits taken at retirement age. The annuity must match the guaranteed minimum pension (GMP) if the occupational scheme is contracted out of the state earnings related pension scheme (SERPS).

  Bookmark with:
What are these?  
Add Bookmark  
 
  resources

 

annuities   marriage breakdown
   
  employer pensions   pension sharing
   
  private pensions   pension audit
   
 
 
 
find out about your annuity and long term care options
 
retirement, pensions, annuities and long term care updates
please add your email below
subscribe
unsubscribe

 
 
 
 
 
 

Disclaimer: Information found on this site does not amount to financial advice or legal advice. Every time you access the website you agree to be bound by the Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree to be bound by them, you should not use the sharingpensions.co.uk website. Before taking any action regarding pensions, pension on divorce or any other financial or legal matter you should seek professional advice.

   
index / glossary
  Copyright©2001-08 Moneyengines.co.uk Ltd. All Rights Reserved terms and conditions