retirement, annuities, long term care, pensions on divorce
 
 
find answers to pension and pension on divorce problems  
search this site
  Best Annuity Rates
  annuity rate directory
  best annuity rates
  conventional rates
  smoker rates
  other annuity rates
  Annuities
  annuity rates explained
  annuity quotes
  pension annuity
  open market option
  with profit annuities
  smoker annuities
  diabetes annuity
  impaired health
  long term care
  immediate needs
  purchased life annuity
  Pensions
  pension simplification
  employer pensions
  private pensions
  state pensions
  other pension benefits
  pensions in retirement
  leaving service
  corporate benefits
  director SSAS
  salary sacrifice
  income drawdown
  drawdown rates
  Divorce
  marriage breakdown
  divorce proceedings
  ancillary relief
  step-by-step guide
  assets on divorce
  pension on divorce
  pension analysis
  CETV valuations
  pensions valuation
  £25 Actuarial Report
  £50 Uniformed Report
  pension sharing
  case study
  earmarking
  Topics
  legislation
  your questions
  terms and conditions
  privacy policy
 
home | about us | our services | contact us | site map | links
 
case law

 

£25 Actuarial Report
  £25 Actuarial Report values a defined benefit scheme. It takes only 10 minutes online and gives you a 5-page report signed off by an accreted actuary click here  
  Pension values 30% greater than the CETV.
On divorce find out if the provider quote values the pensions fairly. Start here by comparing some valuation examples
 
 
T v T (1998)
 
In this case the couple were married for 14.5 years and at the time of divorce they had no children. The wife had worked for 7 years, was entitled to £175,000 to purchase her own house and 50% of £36,000 of join savings. She was also entitled to £22,000 per annum in maintenance until her remarriage or death, reducing to £17,000 after a year assuming she could earn £5,000 per annum herself.

The court held that the law did not require the court to make compensation for loss of pension rights, despite the request from the wife for an earmarking order on her husband's pension, and compensation for potential lost widows pension. Only the husband's death in service benefits were earmarked. The Judge considered the valuation method used by providers being the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) but questioned the possibility of finding an accurate value and therefore whether the CETV Method was worthwhile.

 

  Bookmark with:
What are these?  
Add Bookmark  
  resources

 

caselaw pages   annuities
   
  private pensions   pensions in retirement
   
  employer pensions   pension terms
   
 
 
 
find out about your annuity and long term care options
 
retirement, pensions, annuities and long term care updates
please add your email below
subscribe
unsubscribe
index / glossary
 
 
 
 
 

Disclaimer: Information found on this site does not amount to financial advice or legal advice. Every time you access the website you agree to be bound by the Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree to be bound by them, you should not use the sharingpensions.co.uk website. Before taking any action regarding pensions, pension on divorce or any other financial or legal matter you should seek professional advice.

   
 
  Copyright©2001-08 Moneyengines.co.uk Ltd. All Rights Reserved terms and conditions